Great discussion going on...

....regarding Vonage, Ben Edelman and all manner of other funky things here. I don't agree with the article in the slightest, especially as

1) I don't really see how random bloggers potentially "misinterpreting" Ben's research has anything to do with him and

2) the guy slams bloggers for doing just that, then goes on to call his piece "The distortions of Ben Edelman, or how Vonage isn't spyware scum". Ten points if you actually spot where Ben called Vonage "spyware scum" in his original writeup. Why should I pay attention to someone's apparent obsession with semantics, when he then uses artistic licence to do exactly what he's accusing everyone else of doing?